Evaluating your community for potential sources of PFAS can help you assess a potential PFAS problem. Identifying these sources can also help community leaders obtain access to funding for remediation and control efforts.
The aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF) used to fight chemical fires are a common source of PFAS contamination. After an emergency or training exercise, released AFFF can seep into the ground to contaminate soil and groundwater on adjacent Tribal Lands. AFFF that enters the storm drainage system can also contaminate local surface waters and enter the public water systems.
AFFF is also used regularly to fight fires involving flammable liquids. Although fluorine-free foams (FFF) are available, they are slowly being phased in, and not all FFF are free from PFAS. Pace® can test both your legacy AFFF and newer stocks of FFF to determine how much and which PFAS they contain.
Our Emergency Rapid Response team can help you assess potential PFAS contamination in the event of a fire, train derailment, or other disaster.
Whether testing for drinking water compliance or public health and safety concerns, Pace® has the services you need. We offer testing services for a wide range of liquid and solid matrices, including potable & non-potable waters, leachate, solids, soil & sediment, stack emissions, and air. In addition to analyzing for targeted PFAS, we can also analyze matrices for total organic fluorine and PFAS precursors.
Landfills are another common source of PFAS contamination. As liquid (rain, condensation, liquid waste) passes through a landfill, it can leach PFAS from other waste products. Common examples include construction materials, carpeting, packaging, weather-proof clothing, and non-stick cookware. If the lining breaks down – or if the landfill was never lined – this leachate can contaminate the surrounding soil and groundwater.
Storm sewers, industrial discharge, landfill leachate, and other non-potable liquids that can contain PFAS are often sent to the wastewater treatment facility for processing. Unfortunately, traditional wastewater treatment does not remove PFAS. In fact, it can convert PFAS precursors into PFAS, further compounding a local contamination issue.
Roughly half of the domestic sewage sludge produced by wastewater treatment in the United States is applied to agriculture as biosolids. If Tribal Lands are surrounded by agriculture, PFAS contamination can spread to local ground and surface waters and contaminate food and drinking water supplies. While this is particularly a concern for more rural communities, PFAS has also been found in some brands of organic fertilizers used by home gardeners.
Incineration has long-been a preferred method for disposing of industrial waste and chemical stockpiles. Unfortunately, new evidence suggests that “thermal destruction” isn’t as effective as once thought, and high winds can carry products that have not completely combusted (PICs) to surrounding communities. Here are four types of incinerators that can contribute to PFAS contamination on Tribal Lands:
Sampling under the EPA’s fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 5) began in January 2023. All public water systems (PWS) serving 3,300 or more customers, plus 800 randomly selected smaller systems, will be required to test each entry point to the distribution system for 29 PFAS plus lithium. The EPA has also selected several hundred smaller PWS to participate as well.
We’re certified/accredited by NELAC, ISO, DOD, DOE, and in every state with a PFAS lab certification program.
For emergencies, our Rapid Response Team can provide defensible results in as little as 24 hours.
We are committed to helping our customers advance their important work through building strong relationships, delivering upon expectations, and providing exceptional customer service.
We can test for PFAS in both solid and aqueous matrices, including potable and non-potable waters, soils, and biota.
We’re on the leading edge of science, working with EPA, DOD, ASTM, and others to develop new methods for analyzing PFAS.